judith_s: (Default)
Your Learning Style: Objective and Rational

You are logical and rational. You are open to any ideas or subjects that make sense to you.

You Should Study:

Anthropology
Economics
Engineering
Finance
Law
Philosophy
Political Science


Well, we've got 2 out of 7 so far. I don't think I'm going back to school though.
judith_s: (Default)
thanks for the link [livejournal.com profile] japlady

For folks like me, who like to stay up all night sometimes, this study is rather frightening. Maybe it's time to start taking melatonin supplements when I stay up late into the night.
judith_s: (Default)
When I first saw this I thought it might be fake, but no, it's real & it's on Forbes' web site. Why you shouldn't marry a career woman, brought to you by the lovely folks at Forbes.

I haven't yet looked at the underlying studies, but the entire attitude & tone of this article is pissing me off. Once I get past that, I will look at the underlying studies & figure out if they actually have something real here, or if it his is just a swipe at those women taking away jobs from the rich white males who are Forbes' target audience.
judith_s: (Default)
Brent R. Wilkes, the CEO of a company that primarily lives off federal contracts summarizes how it works:

Mr. Wilkes described the appropriations process as little more than a shakedown. He said that lobbyists close to the committee members unceasingly demanded campaign contributions from entrepreneurs like him. Mr. Wilkes and his associates have given more than $706,000 to federal campaigns since 1997, according to public records, and he said he had brought in more as a fund-raiser. Since 2000, Mr. Wilkes’s principal company has received about $100 million in federal contracts.

Mr. Wilkes described the system bluntly: “Lowery would always say, ‘It is a two-part deal,’ ” he recalled. “ ‘Jerry will make the request. Jerry will carry the vote. Jerry will have plenty of time for this. If you don’t want to make the contributions, chair the fund-raising event, you will get left behind.’ ”


How is this not illegal?
judith_s: (Default)
So someone on another board asked people for their three favorite books. I found the lists very interesting, and started pondering what I can find out about the people based on their lists. Unfortunately, I don't know most of the people on that list well, so other than the obvious (the person picking the Bible & Book of Mormon is boring & religious) I couldn't do much with the data.

So I thought I would ask you nice folks. I know most of you pretty well. I'm curious if I will find a correlation between your three favorite books & what I know about you. Tell me your three favorite books. Feel free to say why, but that's not required at all.
judith_s: (Default)
I blame [livejournal.com profile] gizbot for showing me this video. You can blame me when you pass it on. :)
judith_s: (Default)
Clearly I'm missing some classics.  Which one of the ones I haven't yet read should be on my "must own" list?

2005 Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, Susanna Clarke (on my to-be-read list)
2004 Paladin of Souls, Lois McMaster Bujold
2003 Hominids, Robert J. Sawyer
2002 American Gods, Neil Gaiman  (made me want to cuddle up with Bulfinch's, and revisit some old Norse legend books)
2001 Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, J. K. Rowling
2000 A Deepness in the Sky, Vernor Vinge
1999 To Say Nothing of the Dog, Connie Willis
1998 Forever Peace, Joe Haldeman

1997 Blue Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson
1996 The Diamond Age, Neal Stephenson
1995 Mirror Dance, Lois McMaster Bujold
1994 Green Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson
1993 Doomsday Book, Connie Willis
1993 A Fire Upon the Deep, Vernor Vinge
1992 Barrayar, Lois McMaster Bujold
1991 The Vor Game, Lois McMaster Bujold
1990 Hyperion, Dan Simmons

1989 Cyteen, C. J. Cherryh
1988 The Uplift War, David Brin
1987 Speaker for the Dead, Orson Scott Card
1986 Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card
1985 Neuromancer, William Gibson

1984 Startide Rising, David Brin
1983 Foundation's Edge, Isaac Asimov
1982 Downbelow Station, C. J. Cherryh
1981 The Snow Queen, Joan D. Vinge
1980 The Fountains of Paradise, Arthur C. Clarke
1979 Dreamsnake, Vonda N. McIntyre
1978 Gateway, Frederik Pohl
1977 Where Late the Sweet Birds Sang, Kate Wilhelm
1976 The Forever War, Joe Haldeman
1975 The Dispossessed, Ursula K. Le Guin
1974 Rendezvous with Rama, Arthur C. Clarke
1973 The Gods Themselves, Isaac Asimov

1972 To Your Scattered Bodies Go, Philip José Farmer
1971 Ringworld, Larry Niven
1970 The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin

1969 Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner
1968 Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny
1967 The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, Robert A. Heinlein
1966 Dune, Frank Herbert

1966 "...And Call Me Conrad" (This Immortal), Roger Zelazny
1965 The Wanderer, Fritz Leiber
1964 "Here Gather the Stars" (Way Station), Clifford D. Simak
1963 The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick
1962 Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein
1961 A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M., Miller Jr
(one of the few SF books I read for school.  I hated it so much.  I haven't reread it though I probably should)
1960 Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein
1959 A Case of Conscience, James Blish
1958 The Big Time, Fritz Leiber
1956 Double Star, Robert A. Heinlein
1955 They'd Rather Be Right (The Forever Machine), Mark Clifton & Frank Riley
1953 The Demolished Man, Alfred Bester
judith_s: (Default)
In a rather significant departure from precedent, the Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision that if the police fails to obey the knock & announce rule (knock & wait for enough time for someone to reach the door before knocking it down), it will not exclude the evidence they find. Apparently fruit of the poisonous tree is just fine to eat now.

The analysis in Scalia's majority opinion hints at some major future changes. According to the opinion, the key query is not whether the law was obeyed but whether "the interest that a constitutional right serves will, in fact, be directly advanced by barring the evidence obtained from a violation of that right." Here the interest according to the court is "not to be caught in your nightgown." And since excluding the evidence doesn't advance that right, the evidence is not excluded.

Short summary: exclusionary rule has been gutted. Expect more doors to be broken down in the near future.
judith_s: (Default)
I'm sure at least one of you can recommend a CD ripping software that works on Windows. Right? Because I just realized that Books-on-Tape are wonderful, except that I own neither a working portable tape player nor a working portable CD player. On the other hand, MP3s are portable, and there is this Treo 650 that claims to play them & lives in my pocket.
judith_s: (Default)
It appears that Rolling Stone is doing the most in depth political reporting these days. I find this stunning, and somewhat depressing. In this very well sourced article about the 2004 election Rolling Stone documents in great detail the level of election fraud that turned Ohio to Bush. I knew there was fraud, but this level of documention is impressive.

Of course, once you no longer have elections, democracy is an empty term. It makes me truly wonder about America's future. We can electioneer and register voters until the cows come home, but if those voters are not permitted to vote, or their votes are changed...
judith_s: (Default)
You scored as Existentialist. Existentialism emphasizes human capability. There is no greater power interfering with life and thus it is up to us to make things happen. Sometimes considered a negative and depressing world view, your optimism towards human accomplishment is immense. Mankind is condemned to be free and must accept the responsibility.

</td>

Existentialist

100%

Materialist

81%

Cultural Creative

69%

Modernist

63%

Postmodernist

50%

Idealist

50%

Romanticist

0%

Fundamentalist

0%

What is Your World View? (updated)
created with QuizFarm.com
judith_s: (Default)
In case you haven't seen it, Wired published a large chunk of the data that is under seal in the EFF v. AT&T lawsuit. I expect that there will be a complaint against Wired, with attempts to find out who the anonymous informant was who provided this data.
judith_s: (Default)
The $70Billion Tax Cut has a lovely little chart on the WaPo site:

Income versus Average tax savings ($)
$10,000-20,000 2
$20,000-30,000 9
$30,000-40,000 16
$40,000-50,000 46
$50,000-75,000 110
$75,000-100,000 403
$100,000-200K 1,388
$200,000-500K 4,499
$500K-1 million 5,562
$1 million+ 41,977

I'll bet that $9 will come in handy to all those folks making $30K a year.
judith_s: (Default)
I don't know who World Net Daily represents, but today's quote (via Crooks & Liars) boggles the mind. In discussing Mexican immigration, and the columnist notes that of course we could get rid of the 12 million Mexican immigrants:

And he [George W. Bush] will be lying, again, just as he lied when he said: "Massive deportation of the people here is unrealistic – it's just not going to work."

Not only will it work, but one can easily estimate how long it would take. If it took the Germans less than four years to rid themselves of 6 million Jews, many of whom spoke German and were fully integrated into German society, it couldn't possibly take more than eight years to deport 12 million illegal aliens, many of whom don't speak English and are not integrated into American society.


Heck, yes, we could rid ourselves of the Mexicans by following the German example of how they "rid themselves" of the Jews. I think my head just exploded.
judith_s: (Default)
You Are a Jam Cookie

On the outside, you project a straight-laced, innocent vibe.
But on the inside, you're complex, exotic, and full of flavor.


I don't remember who to blame for this one.
judith_s: (Default)
Time for some good news, I guess. Although from what I gather this is a calculated political move because he had pretty good odds of losing his seat in what was constructed to be a Republican majority district. Apparently according to his calculations, a replacement candidate would likely win which would enable DeLay to stay on the good side of the Republican party as he uses the revolving door to go right into lobbying.

But DeLay out is still a good thing.
judith_s: (Default)
Where, oh where, did my motivation go?

The hubby is sick, the little guy is clingy. I just want to find the motivation to get work done & cope with the house. I can't even find the motivation to go to bed.
judith_s: (Default)
How to Spot a Baby Conservative. Short summary: the whiny, insecure kid in nursery school, the one who always thought everyone was out to get him, and was always running to the teacher with complaints, s/he grew up to be a conservative. The confident, resilient, self-reliant kids mostly grew up to be liberals.

The study was a 20-year follow-up for 95 kids from Berkeley.

More memes

Mar. 15th, 2006 02:53 pm
judith_s: (Default)
I'm avoiding work. I shouldn't, something is drop-dead-due today. Why did I pick a career with real deadlines again?

Here is a meme anyway.

Ask me one question about each of the following:

1. friends
2. sex
3. music
4. drugs
5. love
6. livejournal

Your questions are screened. I will probably unscreen them when I answer, unless you ask me not to.

Then post this in your journal and see what questions you get asked!
(Gakked from learnteach)